pi3: The Lie of Precision Medicine

My next blog post will be entitled "The Lie of Precision Medicine"
— sarcastic_f (@sarcastic_f) June 23, 2018

This post will be my own personalized rant about the false promises of personalized medicine. It will not be about neurological or psychiatric diseases, the typical topics for this blog. It will be about oncology, for very personal reasons: misery, frustration, and grief. After seven months of research on immunotherapy clinical trials, I couldn't find a single [acceptable] one¹ in either Canada or the US that would enroll my partner with stage 4 cancer. For arbitrary reasons, for financial reasons, because it's not the “right” kind of cancer, because the tumor's too rare, because it's too common, because of unlisted exclusionary criteria, because one trial will not accept the genomic testing done for another trial.² Because of endless waiting and bureaucracy.

But first, I'll let NIH explain a few terms. Is precision medicine the same as personalized medicine? Yes and no. Seems to me it's a bit of a branding issue.

What is the difference between precision medicine and personalized medicine?

There is a lot of overlap between the terms "precision medicine" and "personalized medicine." According to the National Research Council, "personalized medicine" is an older term with a meaning similar to "precision medicine."

Here's a startling paper from 1971, Can Personalized Medicine Survive? (by W.M. GIBSON, MB, ChB in Canadian Family Physician).

[it's a defense of the old-fashioned family doctor (solo practitioner) by Gibson]:

...will the solo practitioner's demise be welcomed, his replacement being a battery of experts in the fields of medicine, surgery, psychiatry and all the new allied health sciences, infinitely better trained than their singlehanded predecessor?

We wouldn't want any confusion between a $320 million dollar initiative and the ancient art of medicine. NIH again:

However, there was concern that the word "personalized" could be misinterpreted to imply that treatments and preventions are being developed uniquely for each individual; in precision medicine, the focus is on identifying which approaches will be effective for which patients based on genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors.

The Council therefore preferred the term "precision medicine" to "personalized medicine." However, some people still use the two terms interchangeably.

So “precision medicine” is considered a more contemporary and cutting-edge term.

Archived from The White House Blog (Obama edition), January 30, 2015.

What about pharmacogenomics?

Pharmacogenomics is a part of precision medicine. Pharmacogenomics is the study of how genes affect a person’s response to particular drugs. This relatively new field combines pharmacology (the science of drugs) and genomics (the study of genes and their functions) to develop effective, safe medications and doses³ that are tailored to variations in a person’s genes.

At present, precision pharmacogenomics is just a “tumor grab” with no promise of treatment in most cases. There are some serious and admirable efforts, but accessibility and costs are major barriers.

#cancer #oncology #genomics
As of January 18, 2018... pic.twitter.com/4KWpuA3yVh
— sarcastic_f (@sarcastic_f) January 18, 2018

But we've been promised such a utopia for quite a while.

Personalized medicine in oncology: the future is now (Schilsky, 2010):

Cancer chemotherapy is in evolution from non-specific cytotoxic drugs that damage both tumour and normal cells to more specific agents and immunotherapy approaches. Targeted agents are directed at unique molecular features of cancer cells, and immunotherapeutics modulate the tumour immune response; both approaches aim to produce greater effectiveness with less toxicity. The development and use of such agents in biomarker-defined populations enables a more personalized approach to cancer treatment than previously possible and has the potential to reduce the cost of cancer care.

Schilsky (2010)

IT'S 2018, WHERE IS THAT FUTURE YOU PROMISED US?

But wait, let's go back further, to 1999:

New Era of Personalized Medicine
Targeting Drugs For Each Unique Genetic Profile

Certainly, there are success stories for specific types of cancer (e.g., Herceptin). A more recent example is the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (Keytruda®), which has shown remarkable results in patients with melanoma, including Jimmy Carter. The problem is, direct-to-consumer marketing creates false hope about the probability that a patient with another form of cancer will respond to this treatment, or one of the many other immunotherapies with PR machines. But if there's a 25% chance or even a 10% chance it'll extend the life of your loved one, you'll go to great lengths to try to acquire it, one way or another. Speaking from personal experience.

But exaggerated claims and the use of the superlatives in describing massively expensive cancer drugs (e.g., “breakthrough,” “game changer,” “miracle,” “cure,” “home run,” “revolutionary,” “transformative,” “life saver,” “groundbreaking,” and “marvel”) are highly questionable (Abola & Prasad, 2016) and even harmful.

It's a truly horrible feeling when you realize there are no options available, and all your hope is gone.

References

Abola MV, Prasad V. (2016). The use of superlatives in cancer research. JAMA oncology. 2(1):139-41.

Gibson WM. (1971). Can personalized medicine survive? Can Fam Physician. 17(8):29-88.

Langreth R, Waldholz M. (1999). New era of personalized medicine: targeting drugs for each unique genetic profile. Oncologist 4(5):426-7.

Schilsky RL. (2010). Personalized medicine in oncology: the future is now. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 9(5):363-6. {PDF}

Footnotes

¹

Oh, well, there was the one trial with a highly toxic combo -- "you cannot travel more than X miles away from our center, because only WE can treat your terrible side effects." And that fun bit was omitted from the consent form.
— sarcastic_f (@sarcastic_f) June 23, 2018

² But hey, we'll do yet another biopsy of your tumor, and let you know the results in 2-3 months, when you're too ill to be enrolled in any trial. Here's a highly relevant article — The fuzzy world of precision medicine: deliberations of a precision medicine tumor board — but I'm afraid to read it.

³ OMFG, you have got to be kidding me. Here is a subset of the possible side effects from one toxic monoclonal antibody duo:

Very likely (21% or more, or more than 20 people in 100):

fatigue/tiredness
decrease or loss of appetite, which may result in weight loss
cough
inflammation of the small intestine and / or large bowel causing abdominal pain and diarrhea which may be severe and life threatening

Less likely (5 – 20% or between 5 and 20 people in 100):

pain and or inflammation in various areas including: muscles , joint, belly, back, chest, headache
flu-like symptoms such as body aches, fever, chills, tiredness, loss of appetite, cough
constipation
dizziness
shortness of breath
infection which may rarely be serious and become life threatening
nausea and vomiting
dehydration
skin inflammation causing hives or rash which may rarely be severe and become life threatening
anemia which may cause tiredness, or may require blood transfusion
itching
abnormal liver function seen by blood tests. This may rarely lead to jaundice (yellowing of the skin and whites of eyes) and be severe or life threatening
abnormal function of your thyroid gland which cause changes in hormonal levels. A decrease in thyroid function as seen on blood tests may cause you to feel tired, cold or gain weight while an increase in thyroid function may cause you to feel shaky, have a fast pulse or lose weight.
Swelling of arms and/or legs (fluid retention)
Changes in the level of body salts as seen on blood tests. You may not have symptoms.
Inflammation of the pancreas that results in increased level of digestive enzymoes (lipase, amylase) seen in bloods and may cause abdominal pain
Inflammation of the lungs (including fluid in the lungs) which could cause shortness of breath, chest pain, new or worse cough. It could be serious and/or life threatening. May occur more frequently if you are receiving radiation treatment to your chest or if you are Japanese.
Serious bleeding events leading to death may occur in patients with head and neck tumors. Please talk to your doctor immediately if you are experiencing bleeding.
Decrease of a protein in your blood called albumin that may cause fluid retention and results in swelling of your legs or arms