Friday 30 September 2016

The Richest Life: Consumer to Advocate

the richest life:consumer to advocateYou want more.

Yes, you have a high-paying job, a dutiful spouse, and all the modern day accoutrements. Underneath your polished veneer, there is a bubbling restlessness.

Something is missing. And you desperately want to reclaim it.

The issue: defining what ‘it’ is. And then doing something it.

It could represent numbing myopia, mounting indifference, or a stirring wanderlust. As you check off your daily to-do list, you recognize the why underlying your simmering discontent.

Life is too comfortable.

The solution: embrace the discomfort.

In life, we crave the familiar. Our daily routine provides order for life’s responsibilities. There is a comforting predictability. The sameness comes in all forms; we cackle at our boss’s overplayed jokes and order the #2 at our favorite deli. We can predict tomorrow — and six months from tomorrow.

In order to appreciate the familiar, you must embrace the unfamiliar. The well-worn cliches are trite, tired, and true.

Challenge yourself. Step out of your proverbial comfort zone. Embrace the fear. The well-traveled path is the one of least resistance.

“Why?” you sputter. “I have a comfortable, easy life. I don’t need to challenge myself.”

And that is the problem. The unfamiliar adds complexity to the routinized life. We may chafe–even recoil–at the unknown. Leery of failure, your mind and soul slowly wilt.

Life’s challenges provide meaning. As mental health consumers, we understand this better than most. Life’s jagged edges have scraped us. But as mental health consumers–even survivors, we have an extraordinary platform to give meaning to our lives and others.

“How so?” you incredulously ask.

We epitomize discomfort. Depression and anxiety have plunged us into despair. There are hours, days, and weeks where mental health shutters us from family, friends, even reality. But through the discomfort, we persevere. We live our fears. And, on the best days, we embrace them.

Paraphrasing a famous philosopher, the easy, comfortable life is a life unlived. As mental health trials bruise and scar, there is a cruel comfort in our struggles. Unlike most, we understand life’s purpose: to share and inspire. But with that understanding, there is a corresponding responsibility. Are you going to embrace the discomfort? Or shy away from it–retreating into your comfortable cocoon?

Over the past year, I have written about my personal struggles. Psych Central has been my personal confessional. As I write about personal failings, a web of self-doubt envelops me. The discomfort is real. Will there be personal or professional repercussions for divulging my mental health struggles? Are my musings self-indulgent? Do my writing inspire or irritate? As my mind cycles through its ritualistic self-doubt, there is a budding realization: these questions are superfluous.

I have embraced my fears and been richly rewarded.

As you read this — maybe on the bus or the subway, you wonder whether your voice — and your struggles — matter. It does. And they do. But the more relevant question: How are you going to transform self-doubt into self-empowerment? And inspire others on their journey.

Kashak/Bigstock



from World of Psychology http://ift.tt/2ddRjQ8
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Omega-3 fatty acid stops known trigger of lupus

A team of researchers has found that consuming an omega-3 fatty acid called DHA, or docosahexaenoic acid, can stop a known trigger of lupus and potentially other autoimmune disorders. DHA can be found in fatty, cold-water fish and is produced by the algae that fish eat and store in their bodies. It can be found in […]

from Lunatic Laboratories http://ift.tt/2dtxQII
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Getting Included on Work Drinks

How can one approach a situation where most staff on the floor go out at the end of the week for Friday night drinks but not everyone is included. It feels horrible to hear them talk about their drinks the following week. As a solution I thought of organizing drinks that included everyone on the floor. This would be held on a different Friday or other night at a different location to avoid a clash.

However when I suggested this to my manager (to have someone to co organize it with) they discussed it with their manager, it got out that someone had “complained”, staff started accusing X a colleague so I had to advise my manager of this and ask they quickly address this to avoid an innocent staff member being bullied. I was then advised I’d blown it all out of proportion, being negative and going on a witch hunt and not to email the whole floor suggesting drinks. I of course advised that I had come up with a positive solution, I wasn’t doing the witch hunting and that I had to respond to avoid an innocent staff member from being bullied plus correct misassumptions.

Anyhow it went horribly pear shaped so I’m wondering what other ways can such situations be handled. Continuing to be polite friendly professional and so forth in the hope that one would eventually be included but not having it happen has lead to me feeling inwardly resentful which hasn’t been helpful.

It sounds like a similar situation to how does one handle the bill at a group dinner when someone (who has usually ordered much more than anyone else) wants to evenly split the bill leaving others on budgets who have ordered cheaper meals struggling.

 

A. You might try being honest. Try telling your manager how you feel. He might not realize that you feel the way you do.

Another possibility is that he might not be aware that you are being left out. Perhaps he thinks that someone else asked you to join them for drinks and you opted not to go. Miscommunication could be part of the problem.

Alternatively, they purposefully might not be inviting certain people. They may be unkind and inconsiderate.

Understandably, no one wants to be left out. It’s hurtful but, in reality, why should you want to be around people who are exclusionary and who don’t seem to want to be with you?

Ask yourself if these are really the people with whom you want to interact. Your time is better spent developing relationships with people who want to be with you and who would never exclude you from their group. Please take care.

Dr. Kristina Randle



from Ask the Therapist http://ift.tt/2dg3U5Z
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Are You Turning Towards Your Partner?

are you turning toward your partner?Well known couples therapists and founders of the Gottman Method for couples therapy, John and Julie Gottman have a wealth of knowledge when it comes to what keeps couples together in a healthy relationship and what can break a relationship apart. In what they coined The Sound Relationship House, the foundation and inside of a healthy relationship rest on things like trust and commitment, fondness and admiration, turning towards and a positive perspective of your partner, as well as a healthy conflict style, and shared meaning.

Today I am focusing on the idea of turning towards instead of turning away from your partner. In Gottman’s research (in which he interviewed newlyweds and again after 6 years) he noticed one thing that stood out was that those who were still married after 6 year were turning towards one another 86% of the time, and those that divorced had turned towards only 33% of the time. What I gather from this piece of evidence is that the idea of turning towards instead of turning away plays a huge role on the health of your relationship and overall success of it.

So what is turning towards? How do you turn towards your partner and what does it look like when you turn away?

Everybody in a relationship makes bids for attention or affirmation or love. Some are small (smiles and touches) and some are big (asking for advice or help). Both people in a relationship ask bids throughout their relationship. Look at some examples:

What is said/done vs. What is meant:

“How was work today?” — Will you talk to me?
“Want to cuddle?” — Will you give me affection or love?
“A coworker yelled at me today.” — Will you give me advice/listen?
“A smile to you by partner…” — Will you give me attention?
“A touch on your arm by your partner…” — Will you give me affection?

Where the problem arises is when the partner making a bid attempt is not noticed or is shut down. We call this a “missed bid” and is considered turning away.

You may be thinking, “I don’t think I miss my partner’s bids for attention.” If you were to put cameras throughout your house, you would be able to see on a second to second basis your partner’s and your bids for one another’s attention, as well as opportunities missed to turn towards.

Think about times you pass one another in the hallway of your house without giving eye contact or smiling at one another. Missed opportunity to turn toward. Your partner says, “It looks crappy outside today.” You don’t respond (because maybe it seems obvious to you that it is or not something that needs to be responded to). Missed bid. You tell your partner that work was stressful and your partner says, “Sorry to hear that.” Wait, that is turning toward isn’t it? Yes, but it is what we call a passive or low energy turning toward. Your partner responds to you, only they miss the opportunity to ask why it was stressful (which is considered an attentive turning towards).

What about applying this in your relationship? Take a look at how you and your partner are making bids and turn towards. The first step is just paying attention to one another. Turning towards each other increases the positive perspective of your partner as well and promotes health within your relationship. Try it out, you may be surprised at the times your partner sends out bids that you miss! Its these small bids for attention that create a foundation of happiness and health in your relationship and increase feelings of connection and understanding.

monkeybusinessimages/Bigstock



from World of Psychology http://ift.tt/2ddijPR
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Book Review: Walking with Plato

Book Review: Walking with Plato

How far would you walk for someone you love? Ten miles? Fifty? One hundred? How about a thousand? As detailed in his book, Walking with Plato, journalist Gary Hayden set out to do just that, accompanying his wife, Wendy, on Great Britain’s longest walking challenge, End to End. Although the trip begins more as a physical challenge for Hayden, his journey becomes a meditation on walking, our relationship to nature, and philosophy.

Like the Appalachian and Pacific Crest Trails in the United States, End to End is a physically demanding, long-distance walk many undertake to fulfill a life goal. Unlike these trails, however, End to End has no set path, but rather makes use of many different trails and roads across the British Isles. Participants walk from John O’Groats in Scotland to Land’s End on the South West Coast, or vice versa, with trips ranging from 850 miles in six weeks to 1200 miles in three months, depending how direct the route is. For more scenic-minded hikers, the walk traverses some of Britain’s most beautiful and challenging trails. For those taking more direct routes, it means a lot of trudging along highways. Campsites are available to all, although many stay in hostels and bed and breakfasts along their routes.

Splitting their journey into chapters with each covering several towns and landmarks, Hayden relates his and Wendy’s experiences with each section of the hike, from their grueling first days to their bittersweet but triumphant arrival at the coast and Land’s End. The two battle blisters, downpours, guard dogs, bogs, broken equipment, exhaustion, and the monotony of long-term walking. We learn the ways in which their bodies and their minds change over the course of their journey — how strange ordinary life begins to seem and how they respond differently to discomfort and adversity.

However, Walking with Plato is not a blow by blow of their trip. In fact, Hayden admits he doesn’t have much of a memory for scenery, in the mode of most travel writing. Nor does he intend to offer a guidebook for would-be End-to-Enders.

Instead, the book is a blend of trip anecdotes with more introverted reflections, relating both the physical and psychological effects of their walk on a backdrop of philosophical discussions. Hayden prefaces each chapter with a quote from a relevant text, including Plato’s Republic and Symposium, Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Nature, and Wordsworth’s “I Traveled Among Unknown Men.” Additionally, the text itself considers the musings of still more of our greatest thinkers, including Rousseau, Nietzsche, Bertrand Russell, Tennyson, Bashō, and many others.

Happily for lay readers, Hayden’s discussions are not purely academic; he delves into the personal lives of his subjects as well. His considerations of Rousseau’s battle with depression and subsequent solace in solitary walking are particularly poignant — and of course highly relevant to the subject of Walking with Plato.

So, although these musings may first appear to be digressions, they actually form the heart of the book and ultimately feel as organic and necessary to the narrative as Hayden’s descriptions of mountains and moors. It is as though the reader is walking beside him, listening to his associations and discussions of philosophy, literature, and life. Although not quite a memoir, Walking with Plato is a highly personal read, and Hayden’s warm, funny style lends itself well to this approach, inviting the reader along for the adventure.

Consequently, the book should appeal to fans of travel writing, hiking, and philosophy alike. And for readers unfamiliar with the texts Hayden references, never fear. He explains everything quite clearly, quotes liberally, and assumes no knowledge on the part of his audience. Rather, he presents these authors’ inquiries in a manner accessible to everyone, offering them as questions relevant to any individual, which, of course, they are.

Finally, for those interested in the psychological effects of walking — particularly as it benefits those suffering from depression and anxiety — you will not find a comprehensive text here. But Hayden does offer some consideration of those topics, establishing an ideal starting point for those hoping to read or think more about the relationship between our mental health and the natural world. Indeed, it may be almost unavoidable to close this book without unearthing some new interest or perhaps revitalizing an old one: be it reading Plato’s dialogues or undertaking a long hike of one’s own. Or perhaps readers will simply make their way outside for a stroll. Whatever the project, the point will not be the destination, but the journey. And if one should happen to entertain some philosophical questions along the way, that’s even better.

Walking with Plato
Oneworld Publications, July 2016
Paperback, 240 pages
$19.99



from Psych Central http://ift.tt/2dfWQq5
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

The Drink That Really Is A Rapid Antidepressant

The most well-known effect of this drink confirmed by research.

** Spark: 17 Steps That Will Boost Your Motivation For Anything (ebook) **



from PsyBlog http://ift.tt/2d1pR6a
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Awesome Mental Health Resources You Probably Didn’t Know About

Awesome Mental Health Resources You Probably Didn't Know About

We come across a lot of announcements for this new thing or that, and most of it is garbage. We do, however, like to promote ideas that we feel offer a valuable community service to both mental health consumers and professionals alike.

I’ve discovered two awesome mental health resources you probably didn’t know about, both of which are absolutely free. Whether you like mental health and psychology apps, or psychology and mental books, one of these services can have the potential to change your life.

Free Psychotherapy e-Books

Who doesn’t like a free book? Sure, it’s an e-book rather than a physical book. But what if I told you not only could you download one free e-book, but you can pick from nearly 1,500 free e-books on mental health, psychiatry, mental disorders, personality, and psychology?

You’d probably think I’ve lost the plot a bit, but honestly, I haven’t. What I have done is find this fantastic resource from the International Psychotherapy Institute that offers (currently) 1,459 psychotherapy e-books available for download. The best part? They are all free, and you can download and read as many of them as you’d like.

Now, granted, some of these “books” are actually just government-published brochures from the likes of the National Institute on Mental Health. But most of them appear to be actual e-books, mostly written for mental health professionals. But even non-professionals may benefit and enjoy reading some of these titles. Some of the most popular downloads include:

Although the download process asks you to fill out some information like your email address, that form is completely optional and can be skipped if you’d like.

PsyberGuide

Ratings of Mental Health Apps

With thousands of health and mental health apps to choose from, how do you know which ones actually are worth your time for the download? To-date, there really hasn’t been any good way to understand the quality of apps available for download to your smartphone or tablet. Sure, you could go by user ratings in the app store you use, but those can be easily be gamed. And other people’s opinions don’t tell you anything about whether the app is based upon a solid research foundation and understanding of psychology.

PsyberGuide to the rescue! PsyberGuide is a project of The One Mind Institute (OMI)(formerly named the International Mental Health Research Organization, or IMHRO). It is a non-profit organization that is devoted to funding cures for brain illnesses.

PsyberGuide is overseen by the highly talented Michael Knable, who helps to keep the project on track, getting new apps to reviewers to conduct a thorough, scientific review of the app, and publishing those reviews on the website. The website lists hundreds of apps that have been reviewed by the project, including those focused on helping people with mood disorders, PTSD and other anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, cognitive behavior therapy, cognitive training, dialectical behavior therapy, mindfulness, and symptom tracking.

So before you waste your time downloading a single new mental health app, spend a few minutes on the PsyberGuide website and check out what they have to say about the app. And if you want to help support the great work they’re doing, scroll down to the bottom of their homepage and click on the Donate button. Donations like yours help fund new reviews (which are expensive and time-consuming to produce, because they are so thorough).



from World of Psychology http://ift.tt/2d1fTlc
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

The Art of Listening to a Teenage Rant

Teenage rantThe complaint from a teenager begins somewhat rational. A project has no real application to a subject matter or life in general. A friend is overly critical when support is needed. Or a teacher instructs only one way leaving kids with different learning styles out in the cold. Then without warning, things escalate into unreasonable. Now school does nothing for students. There are no true friendships. Or everyone wants them to fail.

It is in moments like these that many parents attempt to return the conversation back to rational thinking. This is done in a variety of ways such as minimizing what is happening, pointing out the exaggeration, invalidating their teenager’s feelings, or trying to solve the issue at hand. But this does not produce the results a parent wants, rather things either become more intense or the teenager completely shuts down. There is another way.

Notice the environment. As strange as it may sound, teenage rants are golden moments. For a short period of time, a parent is thrust into the thought pattern of their child. It is a precious time which should be seen as valuable. This is a chance to understand how the teenager thinks, processes their environment, problem solves (or doesn’t), and feels about their circumstances. Take note of when this rant occurred to use this information later. Was there an audience or was it while being alone? Did it happen early in the morning or late in the day? Was it out in pubic or in a private area?

Become quiet. The natural temptation for a parent is to try to help solve the problem or point out the inaccuracies in the teenager’s thinking. Don’t do this, instead become quiet and observant. Listen to what is said and what is not said. It is rarely the first thing a person complains about that is the real issue. Rather it is the issue stated with the most emotion that is likely to be at the heart of the rant. All other topics should be dismissed.

Watch body language. When a parent is not speaking, it is far easier to become aware of the teenager’s body language. This is as important if not more so than the words or emotions that are being communicated. Signs of physical discomfort in connection with mentioning a person’s name can be a signal that there is something not right about that relationship. While many adults have learned to control their body language, teenagers, especially when angry, have not. It is best to go with the simplest meaning first when interpreting the signals.

Remember the life stage. Teenagers are not children and they are not adults. Parents who treat their teenagers childlike postpone adulthood unnecessarily. While parents who expect adult behavior from a teenager put too much unneeded pressure on their kid. There is a balance between the two. But every once in a while a teenager will act like a child just as they will also act like an adult. This is normal and healthy. All parents when through the crisis of being a teenager which is good to remember when listening to a teenage rant.

Choose words wisely. Unless the teenager is specifically asking for help, parents should not give it. This is an unintentional trap. When a parent gives advice, the parent is accepting responsibility for the outcome according to the teenage brain. So if things go even slightly wrong, the teenager is not responsible, the parent is. This does not teach a teenager how to be an adult. Regardless of how ridiculous the rant may sound, parents should not try to restore balance. Again, if the teenager asks for it, then a parent can do it but if not, the same principle applies: it is an unintentional trap. This time, the teenager will use the parent’s explanation as justification for why the parent is clueless in their mind. Eventually, the teenager will stop sharing all together.

Express empathy. The best method for handling a rant is for a parent to express empathy. However, parents should not say, “I know how you feel because I felt the same way at your age.” This leads to an automatic shutdown for a teenager because life now is very different compared to the dark ages when a parent was a teen. Instead say, “I’m so sorry you are frustrated. I wish I could help.” This does not minimize the teenager’s feelings but does communicate a desire to help if the teenager wants it. At the end of a rant, it is best to conclude with a statement of love for the teenager so they know that nothing has changed in the relationship.

These steps are very difficult for most parents because the natural instinct is to protect and help. However, when these steps are done consistently, a parent will see a dramatic shift in their relationship with their teenager for the better.

 

Christine Hammond is a Licensed Mental Health counselor who lives in Orlando and is the award-winning author of The Exhausted Woman’s Handbook.



from Psych Central Professional http://ift.tt/2cQyZwA
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Relationship OCD

relationship OCDOne thing is definite about obsessive-compulsive disorder. It is creative, with no shortage of themes to latch onto. Typically, OCD will attack the very things the person with the disorder holds most dear. Training to reach your dream as an Olympic swimmer? OCD will make you fear the water. Just get that job promotion you’ve been working toward for years? OCD will try to convince you that you’ll never be successful in your work. Met the love of your life? The one you’ve been waiting for? OCD will make you question the relationship over and over. This last example of OCD is actually quite common, and widespread enough that it has a name: Relationship OCD or R-OCD.

Those with R-OCD struggle with the belief that perhaps they should no longer be with their spouses (or significant others) either because they think they might not really love them, aren’t compatible, or whatever. The reasons the relationship has come into question are not important. What matters is that the person with R-OCD is looking for certainty; a guarantee that their choice of partner is the right one. They just want to be sure. To be clear, I’m not talking about those fleeting thoughts that we all have once in a while. I’m talking about unrelenting, strong obsessive thoughts that tell the person with OCD to get out of the relationship. These feelings are so overpowering that some people even become physically ill because of them.

One of the reasons why these thoughts might be so distressing is because those with obsessive-compulsive disorder know their thoughts are not rational. They know how much they love and care for their partner. But these thoughts torment nonetheless. They incite doubt. It’s not surprising that it can be upsetting and confusing to not only the person with OCD, but to his or her significant other as well.

R-OCD is most common in those who exhibit other symptoms of OCD, and for these people, R-OCD might not be too difficult to diagnose. But there are some people whose OCD only revolves around relationships and these cases of R-OCD might go undiagnosed.

So how to you know if you are dealing with R-OCD? Couples have issues and end relationships all of the time for all kinds of reasons. Certainly it’s not always due to R-OCD. How can we sort out what’s really going on?

I highly recommend reading this article which can help you figure out if R-OCD might be an issue. If you are dealing with obsessive thinking and intolerance of uncertainty, for example, then seeking professional help is probably a good idea.

The treatment for R-OCD is the same as for all types of OCD. Exposure and Response prevention (ERP) therapy is the frontline psychological approach for treating the disorder. Finding a therapist who specializes in treating OCD is imperative. Left untreated, those with R-OCD commonly will either be in an on-again off-again relationship with the same person, or be in a series of failed relationships. 

OCD can be a devastating disorder that wreaks havoc on a person’s life. In my opinion, Relationship OCD is one of the most heart-breaking types of OCD. It attacks one of the most basic of human needs and desires — to love and be loved.

If you think you might be suffering from R-OCD, please seek appropriate help. The good news is that it, like all forms of OCD, is highly treatable, and you can go on to live a life filled with love. 

ntonioGuillem/Bigstock



from Psych Central http://ift.tt/2dK5SN8
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Does Psychology of Greed Explain Current Crisis in UK Sport?

psychology of greedSam Allardyce has resigned from his “dream job” as manager of the England football team, partly because he discussed accepting a seemingly dodgy £400,000 deal with undercover newspaper reporters, but the psychological puzzle remains: why the pursuit of yet more cash, given he was on a £3 million-a-year contract plus bonuses?

Revelations of widespread corruption involving backhanders and ‘bungs’ in a sport awash with money, by managers and agents already being paid astronomical sums, resonates with greed in other professions such as banking, where an insatiable appetite for yet more apparently led to risky behaviors with calamitous consequences.

Allardyce’s apparent greed may have lost him his job and plunged English football into a crisis, threatening the fans’ faith in the game, but was it not also the greed of financiers and their reckless decisions to line their wallets that produced the subprime mortgage crisis in the USA and the debt crisis in Europe involving into a global economic catastrophe?

Is Greed a Growing Problem in Modern Times?

Patrick Mussel and Johannes Hewig from the Julius Maximilians University WÃŒrzburg Department of Psychology in Germany have just published one of the most up-to-date and in-depth investigations of the psychology of greed.

Ravenousness can be for more than money, but an insatiable desire for more can apply to excessive want for power, status, food or sex. Athletes have recently been accused of dodgy use of performance enhancing drugs under the cover of medical exemptions – as some of those accused were already champions anyway. If proven true,ould these allegations attest to a kind of greed when it comes to winning?

Insatiability seems to land people in trouble because it’s not merely about wanting more, but seems to include incredibly strong drives leading to ignoring warning signs that their voraciousness is going to end in self-destruction.

Psychologically, greedy people may therefore be running away from something unpleasant (some kind of state of deprivation), not just hurtling toward something desirable. Does a feeling of never having enough become an itch which it’s impossible to scratch for deeper psychological reasons?

If greed is a desire to get more at all costs, it explains the appetite for risking everything. It’s this self-destructive element, not just merely wanting more, that lies at the heart of the psychological enigma that is gluttony.

Status and Power

The authors of this new study, entitled, “The Life and Times of Individuals Scoring High and Low on Dispositional Greed,” point out that greed is also related to status and power and therefore could be viewed as a wider problem of our whole society beyond the merely personal.

For example, in a capitalistic culture, income and wealth determines social and economic status. This status is signalled or becomes visible to others, through ownership and display of expensive and prestigious objects.

The desire for more, therefore, becomes a strong striving for status.

So one psychological account of greedy people is that they are chronically insecure and constantly need more, to prove to others how worthwhile they are and deserving of respect.

This study, published in the‘Journal of Research in Personality, used a variety of risk and economics experiments to explore the personality of the greedy.

The investigation found the greedy scored low on the personality trait of ‘agreeableness’, which could be interpreted as a tendency to be compassionate, cooperative and helpful, as opposed to being argumentative.

Because of these more unpleasant aspects of personality perhaps the greedy become less popular. So are they compensating by trying to impress you with having more stuff?

Greedy people were also found in this study to be more assertive (which may explain why they rise to the top of organisations and society), but greedy people also had a strong tendency to be more mean and selfish.

Link to Psychopathy

The authors of the study were surprised at how strongly greed was linked to certain aspects of psychopathy, including in particular, deficient empathy, disdain for and lack of close attachments with others, rebelliousness, excitement seeking, exploitativeness and empowerment through cruelty.

This study found that greedy people pursue pleasure and satisfaction without regard for and at the expense of others.

This finding perhaps explains the trail of disaster and suffering that greedy people leave in their wake following their rapaciousness, producing not just a personal catastrophe but a disaster for others. This situation was the case with the financial crisis, with all the consequent unemployment and personal suffering involving millions across the globe.

There is also the suffering that must be the lot of those in close relationships with the greedy when everything suddenly goes badly and a previously glittering career ends in ruins and humiliation.

This study also uncovered that an avaricious appetite for desirable stuff appears incompatible with a solid desire for interpersonal closeness, empathy or altruism.

This result appears at odds with conventional economic views where greed is seen as a desirable and an inevitable feature of a well-regulated, indeed, well-balanced economy.

Previous research found that greed is positively associated with competitiveness and being more productive, suggesting that greed may be helpful for getting ahead.

If earning a lot of money is an indicator of success, surely it is because this accomplishment implies desirable personal qualities such as autonomy and independence. We admire people who have a lot because it looks like they deserved it, having struggled nobly for it.

However, if constant striving for yet more stuff is at the expense of others, this behavior now starts to look greedy.

kulyk/Bigstock



from Psych Central Professional http://ift.tt/2dws5zh
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Grit and Low Self-Esteem

From the U.S.: I was wondering if it were possible for people to have a strength called ‘grit’ while also having low self-esteem, and if that is considered rare, or what researchers would identify as an outlier in some studies. If it isn’t rare, then how is this possible?

I grew up with a battery of childhood traumatic experiences, and one of the resulting symptoms include low self-esteem. However, despite my lifelong internalizing adversities related to the traumas I had experienced, I’ve been able to somehow remain positive (at least intellectually, but not always emotionally), goal-oriented, empathetic toward others, a high achiever, etc. Depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem have always been there, and it is a daunting, nearly everyday battle. I’ve had a lot of therapy to help me cope over the years, but even before treatment decades ago, I was always gritty. I won awards in college and was told by a few of my professors that I had this thing called ‘grit,’ or was very resilient or strong. I’ve been told by some friends (usually the ones who were safe and not ‘toxic’) that I have a positive and helpful way about me, and that my transparency for being honest and real is very influential.

Still, for as long as I can remember from childhood, I have been able to hold onto my dreams and believe deep inside that I have worth, despite my low self-esteem inside that says that I’m worthless, feelings of inferiority at times, feelings of shame at others, and a deep depression that is still grieving over all the pain from childhood abuse and mirroring/internalizing the abuses that happened to me.

I really believe that my grade school teachers helped me remain somewhat sane, despite my poor grades when I was a child and teen, and despite my having to move and change schools numerous times. I’ve experienced deep depression, and my internal grittiness has not always been externally shown, though cognitively I just knew all along that things would get better, even though inside and outside, for a while in my 20s and 30s, I was deeply depressed while experiencing a lot of flashbacks. I sought help for my depression, but I didn’t think to ever mention the grit that lied underneath, until now. I was wondering if there were others out there like me.

A: It is absolutely possible to hold onto grit and still have low self esteem. Grit is a measure of someone’s perseverance. Self-esteem is a reflection of how much you like yourself.

You know that you have every reason to like yourself. You’ve demonstrated over and over again that you succeed where others in a similar position might give up. You also are a good friend to your friends. Sadly, you haven’t yet found a way to be a good friend to yourself in spite of years of therapy. Do give yourself credit for being gritty in therapy as well as in your daily life.

I think you are correct to thank your grade school teachers. Abused kids who survive and thrive often find adults who offer them an alternative view of themselves from what they are experiencing at home. I hope you will hold onto the fact that those teachers saw something in you beyond grit. They liked you!

I can’t answer your question about how many people out there are like you. However, you’ve come to the right place. PsychCentral has many online support groups. People in our community regularly connect with each other and share their stories and their support for one another. Click on the “Find Help” tab. Then go to “Forums.” I’m sure you’ll find a welcoming group who can provide you with good information and help.

I wish you well.
Dr. Marie



from Ask the Therapist http://ift.tt/2dwvklQ
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Grit and Low Self-Esteem

From the U.S.: I was wondering if it were possible for people to have a strength called ‘grit’ while also having low self-esteem, and if that is considered rare, or what researchers would identify as an outlier in some studies. If it isn’t rare, then how is this possible?

I grew up with a battery of childhood traumatic experiences, and one of the resulting symptoms include low self-esteem. However, despite my lifelong internalizing adversities related to the traumas I had experienced, I’ve been able to somehow remain positive (at least intellectually, but not always emotionally), goal-oriented, empathetic toward others, a high achiever, etc. Depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem have always been there, and it is a daunting, nearly everyday battle. I’ve had a lot of therapy to help me cope over the years, but even before treatment decades ago, I was always gritty. I won awards in college and was told by a few of my professors that I had this thing called ‘grit,’ or was very resilient or strong. I’ve been told by some friends (usually the ones who were safe and not ‘toxic’) that I have a positive and helpful way about me, and that my transparency for being honest and real is very influential.

Still, for as long as I can remember from childhood, I have been able to hold onto my dreams and believe deep inside that I have worth, despite my low self-esteem inside that says that I’m worthless, feelings of inferiority at times, feelings of shame at others, and a deep depression that is still grieving over all the pain from childhood abuse and mirroring/internalizing the abuses that happened to me.

I really believe that my grade school teachers helped me remain somewhat sane, despite my poor grades when I was a child and teen, and despite my having to move and change schools numerous times. I’ve experienced deep depression, and my internal grittiness has not always been externally shown, though cognitively I just knew all along that things would get better, even though inside and outside, for a while in my 20s and 30s, I was deeply depressed while experiencing a lot of flashbacks. I sought help for my depression, but I didn’t think to ever mention the grit that lied underneath, until now. I was wondering if there were others out there like me.

A: It is absolutely possible to hold onto grit and still have low self esteem. Grit is a measure of someone’s perseverance. Self-esteem is a reflection of how much you like yourself.

You know that you have every reason to like yourself. You’ve demonstrated over and over again that you succeed where others in a similar position might give up. You also are a good friend to your friends. Sadly, you haven’t yet found a way to be a good friend to yourself in spite of years of therapy. Do give yourself credit for being gritty in therapy as well as in your daily life.

I think you are correct to thank your grade school teachers. Abused kids who survive and thrive often find adults who offer them an alternative view of themselves from what they are experiencing at home. I hope you will hold onto the fact that those teachers saw something in you beyond grit. They liked you!

I can’t answer your question about how many people out there are like you. However, you’ve come to the right place. PsychCentral has many online support groups. People in our community regularly connect with each other and share their stories and their support for one another. Click on the “Find Help” tab. Then go to “Forums.” I’m sure you’ll find a welcoming group who can provide you with good information and help.

I wish you well.
Dr. Marie



from Depression – Ask the Therapist http://ift.tt/2dwvklQ
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Best of Our Blogs: September 30, 2016

Microphone Illustration, Let Your Voice Be Heard, Share Your OpiIf you are a truth teller you may experience two extremes. There will be people who can’t stand to be near you and others who are drawn to you.

It can be an isolating path when you speak honestly. But when you do it in company of those who are comfortable sharing theirs, it’s like coming home.

All of us are looking to be heard, and validated for who we are. But many of us are too afraid of rejection to remove our protective shells. It’s much easier to hide behind false perfection or superficial niceties.

But when we share what we really think and how we really feel, we open the light in. This light invites others to share their own truth. That’s how we blossom. That’s how we begin to change the world.

The next time someone asks how you feel. Be like our bloggers this week. Take a risk in your relationships. Be honest with them and yourself.

Why Unloved Daughters Fall for Narcissists
(Knotted) – You succumb to their charm every time. Why do narcissists captivate you so? Your childhood will explain why.

11 Superpowers of Kids with ADHD
(Stress Better) – You’re used to hearing all the bad things about ADHD. Here are the surprising strengths that also come with it.

How to Stop Dating the “Wrong” People and Attract Healthy Love
(Happily Imperfect) – You’ve asked yourself this a million times. But here’s the real reason why you keep falling for the wrong partner.

Losing Yourself in a Relationship: 5 Things to Avoid
(Relationship Corner) – You don’t just get involved in relationships. You get submerged into them. Here’s how to stop getting enmeshed.

The One Thing Every Kid with Anxiety Should be Doing
(Parenting Anxious Kids) – If you’re helping your child cope with anxiety by having them think of something else, try this instead.



from World of Psychology http://ift.tt/2cFQwta
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

More great news: Our brains are polluted with environmental magnetite.

From Maher et al.:

Summary
We identify the abundant presence in the human brain of magnetite nanoparticles that match precisely the high-temperature magnetite nanospheres, formed by combustion and/or friction-derived heating, which are prolific in urban, airborne particulate matter (PM). Because many of the airborne magnetite pollution particles are less than 200 nm in diameter, they can enter the brain directly through the olfactory nerve and by crossing the damaged olfactory unit. This discovery is important because nanoscale magnetite can respond to external magnetic fields, and is toxic to the brain, being implicated in production of damaging reactive oxygen species (ROS). Because enhanced ROS production is causally linked to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, exposure to such airborne PM-derived magnetite nanoparticles might need to be examined as a possible hazard to human health.
Abstract
Biologically formed nanoparticles of the strongly magnetic mineral, magnetite, were first detected in the human brain over 20 y ago [Kirschvink JL, Kobayashi-Kirschvink A, Woodford BJ (1992) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(16):7683–7687]. Magnetite can have potentially large impacts on the brain due to its unique combination of redox activity, surface charge, and strongly magnetic behavior. We used magnetic analyses and electron microscopy to identify the abundant presence in the brain of magnetite nanoparticles that are consistent with high-temperature formation, suggesting, therefore, an external, not internal, source. Comprising a separate nanoparticle population from the euhedral particles ascribed to endogenous sources, these brain magnetites are often found with other transition metal nanoparticles, and they display rounded crystal morphologies and fused surface textures, reflecting crystallization upon cooling from an initially heated, iron-bearing source material. Such high-temperature magnetite nanospheres are ubiquitous and abundant in airborne particulate matter pollution. They arise as combustion-derived, iron-rich particles, often associated with other transition metal particles, which condense and/or oxidize upon airborne release. Those magnetite pollutant particles which are less than ∼200 nm in diameter can enter the brain directly via the olfactory bulb. Their presence proves that externally sourced iron-bearing nanoparticles, rather than their soluble compounds, can be transported directly into the brain, where they may pose hazard to human health.


from Deric's MindBlog http://ift.tt/2dJtce6
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Injury risk and ADHD

"The results indicate that there is an elevated injury risk among Swedish schoolchildren with ADHD [attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder] but not for children with ASD [autism spectrum disorder]."So went the findings reported by Carl Bonander and colleagues [1] providing yet more important data on how a diagnosis of ADHD might be something that confers quite a bit of additional risk for all-manner of different negative outcomes.I've hinted at this important topic before as per some discussion a few years back on how road crossing behaviour might be 'affected' by a diagnosis of ADHD (see here). This time around Swedish researchers compared the risk of injury for those diagnosed with autism vs. risk of injury for those diagnosed with ADHD based on school nurse collected- and school-based data (survey A and B respectively). "After adjusting for confounders, ADHD was associated with a 65% increased risk of injury... in Survey A, and a 57% increased risk of injury... in Survey B" relative to data derived from "unaffected controls."A quick look through the other peer-reviewed material on this topic reveals the extent to which a diagnosis of ADHD might increase the risk of various injuries. Take the paper by Silva and colleagues [2] who noted that in "young children who are subsequently diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)" there was an increased risk of hospitalisation for all manner of different things: "head injuries, burns, poisons, all other injuries." Other studies have reported similar findings [3] including that relying on 'big data' from the big data capital that is Taiwan [4] (see here for more chatter on Taiwan).Whilst no-one is suggesting that every visit to accident and emergency (the emergency room) is somehow the product of ADHD, there are some potentially important lessons to learn from such collected data. Timely diagnosis and appropriate management of ADHD symptoms when they affect quality of life are two points raised, bearing in mind 'management' might include several strategies (see here and see here and see here). Where also hospitals or other medical professionals are presented with children or young people who are 'regular visitors', one might also look to the possibility of preferential screening for something like ADHD too as part of additional enquiries. I might add that whilst Bonander and colleagues looked at ADHD vs. autism when it comes to injury risk, one must not forget that ADHD and autism occurring together is not an uncommon finding (see here) and accident and emergency is not necessarily an unfamiliar place to some of those on the autism spectrum (see here). There is more to do in this important area of research.Finally, I'm also minded to reiterate that hosptial admissions for certain chronic somatic issues might also flag up preferential ADHD screening as well (see here)...----------[1] Bonander C. et al. Injury risks in schoolchildren with attention-deficit/hyperactivity or autism spectrum disorder: Results from two school-based health surveys of 6- to 17-year-old children in Sweden. J Safety Res. 2016 Sep;58:49-56.[2] Silva D. et al. Children diagnosed with attention deficit disorder and their hospitalisations: population data linkage study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;23(11):1043-50.[3] Hurtig T. et al. The Association Between Hospital-Treated Injuries and ADHD Symptoms in Childhood and Adolescence: A Follow-Up Study in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986. J Atten Disord. 2016 Jan;20(1):3-10.[4] Kang JH. et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder increased the risk of injury: a population-based follow-up study. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Jun;102(6):640-3.----------Bonander C, Beckman L, Janson S, & Jernbro C (2016). Injury risks in schoolchildren with attention-deficit/hyperactivity or autism spectrum disorder: Results from two school-based health surveys of 6- to 17-year-old children in Sweden. Journal of safety research, 58, 49-56 PMID: 27620934...




from Research Blogging - Psychology - English http://ift.tt/2cFE6Bb
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Self-Appointed Destructive Critic


by @bahniks - click on image for a larger view


By now, those of you familiar with the “methodological terrorism” controversy (PDF) are probably sick of  it. I won't go into any detail, other than to say that disagreements between the communities of (1) traditional psychologists who respect the current peer review process, and (2) reformers who advocate replication, post-publication peer review in social media, and alternate modes of dissemination, have been heated. In a nutshell, are the new media bad for science or good for science?

Here, I'd like to examine some ideas in isolation from their source(s). This is to avoid the appearance of an ad hominem attack and to maintain a civil tone. Ultimately, we may learn that abusive argumentation and incivility are less common than expected. Or not well-defined, at least.


Ad Hominem (Abusive) Argument.

“Attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself, when the attack on the person is completely irrelevant to the argument the person is making.”

Does this really happen all that often?1 Does questioning someone's motives for maintaining the status quo constitute an ad hominem attack? If a researcher receives widespread media attention for their findings, can we find fault with their public statements, or is this ad hominem too? Off-the-cuff remarks on Twitter are the most likely place for attacks that meet the “abusive argument” definition. We should avoid it, or else it supports the trash-talk allegations.


Tone.

What is the appropriate tone for online debate? Who decides? Adults have criticized the language and attitudes of youth since the beginning of time. One person's funny irreverent witticism is another's destructo-criticism.

I know I've been misunderstood. A lighthearted spoof with a bold red disclaimer (and advance apologies) was interpreted as sneering, ridiculing, and bullying (of a very senior figure). Another post, Spanner or Sex Object?, wasn't meant as methodological fetishism (so to speak). Some might say the images were objectionable, but they were included along with substantive critiques of the findings and their interpretation, not of the authors.

In the the wider world of the internet, there's no doubt that the level of hostility, trollish behavior, abusive threats, racism, and sexism have risen dramatically (just ask Leslie Jones about her Twitter experience). Let's hope that we can monitor our behavior and filter out mean spirited, personal attacks.


Peer review is more civil.

Like many others, I've suffered from the tone of anonymous peer review at journals.  My very first review as a graduate student was one paragraph long. “The current work doesn't add to the literature, it detracts from it” (or something like that). The decision was made on the basis of only one reviewer. One paragraph. Overly harsh.

That was real encouraging. Enough to drive a fledgling researcher out of the field, eh? “Don't take it personally” is the recommended mantra. Don't take it personally. Don't take it personally.


Destructo-Critic



I'm very proud to have been appointed Destructive Critic by an admired giant in the field - Max Coltheart!


Arguably, I am the first destructo-critic, given that I started The Neurocritic blog back in 2006. This was well before the current replication crisis in social psychology.2 My inaugural entry critiqued an fMRI paper on empathy, followed by posts on lie detection, HARKing,3 media sensationalism, ubiquitous anterior cingulate and insular activation, the insufficiency of fMRI for explaining qualia, mind reading, and anonymous peer review. I didn't notice any ad hominem attacks back then. Have I become more snarky over time?

As Neuroskeptic wondered, when the critics of critics don't name names, how are we to know who are the objectionable ones, and who are the ones aiming to improve the field? Perhaps it's time for some self-examination, and that's true for stakeholders on both sides of the fence. My aim has always been to improve the field I love. Or else, why would I have persisted for so long?


Self-Destructive Critic

In real life I am my own harshest critic. It's a pernicious and intractable element of my disease. I never apply the same standards to other people. I always try to frame criticism (whether in person or in anonymous peer reviews) in as positive a light as possible. “It might be better if the authors tried this...” Try to find the positive elements. Most people would say I'm very considerate.

In real life I am a self-destructive critic of the self. And this is my truth.


Footnotes

1 I can think of one notable exception, a very high profile public figure in the UK... and even then, much of the criticism is of her views.

2 It's mostly called The Replication Crisis in Psychology, but the strong focus has been on social psychology. Neuroimaging research (fMRI) has come under fire as well. Initiatives for data sharing (e.g., OpenfMRI and Neurovault and the fMRI Data Center well before that) and reproducibility are on the rise.

3 Hypothesizing after the results are known (Kerr, 1998)


Further Reading

Promoting open, critical, civil, and inclusive scientific discourse in Psychology

The Day the Palm hit the Face

Some thoughts on methodological terrorism this one is particularly indispensable

Weapons of math destruction

Terrorist Fiske Jab: On “Destructo-Criticism”

“Methodological terrorism” and other myths

We talked to the scientist at the center of a brutal firestorm in the field of psychology


from The Neurocritic http://ift.tt/2del0RN
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Thursday 29 September 2016

How Pornography Can Hurt Your Sex Life

can watching porn spice up your sex lifeInternet pornography has exploded out of the gates in the past ten years, and debates about it can get pretty touchy. When sex addiction therapists talk about its proliferation, we often get attacked for supposedly pathologizing normal sexual behavior, or for excusing “bad” behavior.

The reality is, whether it is labeled sex addiction or something else, porn use can get out of control to the point of causing serious life problems. It can be the sexual version of a gateway drug, pulling people into compulsive cyber-sex use. People lose jobs and families. It can take someone over to the extent he or she no longer ventures past it, is no longer able to have sex with another, whether online or in person.

So maybe your porn use isn’t all-consuming. But you watch it. Moreover, sex with your partner has gone stale or has stopped, and you believe watching it together would be a good way to spice things up. Perhaps he or she flat out refuses, which you find frustrating. Maybe he or she has given in to your request but is not happy. Perhaps he or she thinks it’s great.

I doubt anyone will argue against the fact porn use creates intense excitement. Yet watching porn alone or with your partner can put a big dent in real-life sex for a number of reasons. For one thing, people who watch it regularly get used to the intense rush it creates and to the fantasy of what people should look and act like. Real-life sex starts to feel downright blah. We might even start to say things like, “I’m not cut out for monogamy” or “my partner isn’t enough for me.” It does not occur to us that our solution to “blah” may be the problem, or at least may be exacerbating it.

If this doesn’t seem too alarming, keep in mind what a fair amount of research now shows. Extensive porn use can cause significant erectile dysfunction and low libido, even in people in their teens and twenties.

To paraphrase a French saying, sex in the evening starts in the morning. No matter how casual it is, real-life sex involves a courtship ritual. The ritual might include noticing, appreciating and flirting with your partner and letting him or her know you are doing so. It might include intimacy and something called individuation. That’s when we let the real us shine through, and feel good about it. The sex itself involves kissing, embracing and caressing.

In short, it involves a fun, erotic dance which creates anticipation, confidence and a shared experience. It takes place whether the sexual relationship lasts one night or 20 years. The more it is part of a sexual encounter, the more satisfying the encounter is likely to be. It is not uncommon for it to be more arousing than the actual sex. This is not romance novel stuff. Courtship rituals are important to a lot of different species in the animal kingdom.

Porn crucifies the ritual. Most porn is about penetration, often within the first few moments of a video, with very little time for anything else. There may be a little noticing, but no flirtation or foreplay. Intimacy is way out. The more porn we watch, the more the sex in it becomes our standard, which means the less interested we become in courtship. Real-life sex without courtship stagnates. Porn makes itself stale with its lack of courtship, which is why interest in greater variety or more extreme images tends to grow quickly in people who look at it.

Using porn without our partners’ knowledge is damaging for its own reasons. We don’t touch another person when we look at porn, so we tell ourselves it is not sex. Let’s be honest. It is not real-life sex, but watching other people — which is what we do with porn — is a form of sex called voyeurism.

This is why discovering secret porn use can have the same impact as discovering an affair. It is a sexual betrayal, which is one of the most painful things a person can experience. It leaves our partners feeling abandoned, less than, disrespected, foolish and wondering why they are not good enough. I do see it in clients when it comes to porn. They can feel these things mildly or intensely. Either way trust, confidence and a desire for sex gets whittled away and the relationship stagnates or goes downhill.

If you want to look at porn, at the very least make sure you are honest with your partner about it, and that you and your partner are knowledgeable about the effect it has. It is a lot like not closet-eating junk food, and being knowledgeable of the effect Big Macs have on your heart.

Can’t bring yourself to talk about it? This is a red flag you may lack enough intimacy and openness about sex necessary for a satisfying relationship. Developing such intimacy, as well as practicing more of your own courtship ritual with each other, will probably spice up your sex life a whole lot more than porn ever could.

Ocus Focus/Bigstock



from World of Psychology http://ift.tt/2dqjOaP
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Setting Your Private Practice Up For Success: Time

In  last week’s article, “The #1 Factor in Private Practice Success,” we got down and dirty about what it takes to truly excel in private practice. What is the difference between those who succeed in building thriving practices and those who sputter along, eventually settling for much less? Perseverance.

“Perseverance, schmerseverance!” You declare, curling your lip, a little spittle making its way down your chin.

I know, I know. I get it. I, too, used to be incredibly frustrated with the vague language around success.

Just “stick to it!”

“Don’t give up!”

“GRIT!”

private practice success strategiesThere was a time when I experienced anxiety, frustration and envy when I imagined building my practice. I’d see other people’s success and be worried that they had access to something that I didn’t have. They were just naturally charming, or smart, or business-savvy. They had been blessed throughout their lives with more resources, social capital, education, those whacky black and white baby toys that spewed Mozart and made them mini-geniuses!

Then, slowly, I began to understand that business skills can be learned. There was no mystery. There was no magic bullet. Everyone struggles. Some more, some less. Some with this thing, some with that. But, at the end of the day – me, you – we have the capacity to succeed in private practice if we set ourselves up to flourish.

It is my goal to make the process of prospering in private practice as clear, transparent and accessible as possible for clinicians who come from all walks of life. Yes – that includes you. 

As I noted last week, being able to persevere, come what may, is the primary factor in private practice success. And, from whence does that perseverance stem?

The answer: Knowing your why. Your raisons d’être. Your bliss.

To that aim, in these next three weeks, I will help you break down the broad idea of “knowing your why” into specific, actionable steps.

This week’s step…

Setting Your Private Practice Up for Success: Time

Like many therapists, you likely went into private practice knowing you wanted 1) clients and 2) the ability to pay your bills. Achieving these two goals was your hallmark of success.

This is a problem. When setting up your practice, if you’re not clear about your why beyond 1) more clients and 2) paying bills, you will likely find yourself overwhelmed, stressed out and – yes – paying only your bills, but that’s about it.

Why? Because you set your north star to seeing clients and paying bills.

When you set an intention, that is often what you get. Be vague about your intention and your outcome will likely be equally vague. So, today, I’m going to help you craft a clear and specific intention.

The first intention we will focus on is time.

Your time is valuable, even more valuable than money. Money is, in essence, simply a form of exchange that can buy you more time – time to spend on the floor with your growing toddler, time to fly out to see your aging parents, time to cook a romantic dinner for your Love. It is essential that you’re spending your time in ways that bring you joy.

To that end, when thinking about building a private practice, the first consideration must be around how you want to spend your time. Then set up your entire practice around this aim. The way you envision spending the precious days of your existence here on earth will determine how many clients you see, what kind of therapy you practice, how many weeks out of the year you work, your practice policies and so on.

Putting it Into Practice: Grab a pen. Grab a journal. And take 10 minutes to answer these questions that will help you understand how thetherapist, counseling, marketing value of your time will shape your practice.

  1. Think about the most fulfilling moments you’ve had over the past 15 years. What were you doing? Who were you with?
  2. What does your perfect morning look like? What do you feel like after a morning like this?
  3. Even if you love your clients and love your work, we all have a max capacity. What is the total number of clients you can see in a day, before you start fantasizing about getting home to that glass of wine and tub of ice cream?
  4. How many days of rest does it take to truly recharge and look forward to seeing your clients again? Two? Three? Four?!
  5. How many weeks can you go before you start dreaming of a spa day? A weekend away? A trip to Italy?
  6. Zoom yourself into the future. You are now 72. What do you regret the most about missing out on over the past 32 years?

And done! If you’re very bold, email this article to a trusted friend and commit to sharing your answers with each other.

You simply cannot create a sustainable private practice, without considering how you want to spend the days of your life. In order to provide the best service to your clients, you must make sure your cup of joy is filled to the brim. The first order of business in filling said cup is to be aware of, acknowledge and work within the boundaries of time. Gaining a firm understanding of how you want to fill these limited days is essential to building a thriving practice.

So, what do you do with these answers? Hold them close. Next week, we  dive in to the second factor: Money!At the end of this series, we’ll pull it all together and use it to create the foundation to your thriving practice. If you haven’t read the original article, I suggest you go back and check it out first.

 

photo credits: Rafael Ben-AriSuphakaln WongcompuneGraham Oliver



from Psych Central Professional http://ift.tt/2cFcUxU
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Am I a Sociopath or Psychopath or Just Weird?

Hello all, I have been asking this question my all life. I have a lot of feelings toward pet like my puppy but nearly none towards humans. I tend to do things to manipulate to make them think of me as a good person who cares about them so they would come in handy when I need them. The thing is I am totally unaware of my doings when I do it but only after when I start to analyze my actions later. I realize that my actions become something natural, like it’s common sense for me to pretend that I care about someone. And when I come to sense later, I would feel odd about myself but no guilt or distress.

I have very bad temper but amazingly good at controlling it. I tried to put myself into many situations and I realized I tend to stay really calm no matter what. No signs of fear or freaking out. I put myself in motor accidents, rule breaking, etc. I did not feel a lot.

But I absolutely have emotions and absolutely have never done anything to hurt insects or any other animals. However, I have no problems putting someone in hard situation for displeasing or pissing me off. I am able to manipulate or make someone feel bad or think it’s their fault if something goes wrong.

I do care and do love for one person. I am in a relationship and my boyfriend also thinks I’m quite insensitive towards things but very sweet to him. Like besides him, no other human actually matters. He also thinks I am very alluring, consuming, the way I look or talk can make him feel extremely bad and good at times. He thinks I’m someone he’s been looking for but I know I was not born being someone who satisfies his standards but more like after hearing him talking about who he is looking for, I unconsciously become that person and consume him. However, I truly care and love this person. Whatever is wrong with me, I think he can cure it.

I am constantly filled with ideas and bored at the same time. My work results, my weight, my look has never been stable. As I am working towards a more stable life with my bf, I hope to get myself figured out with some opinions.

A. When mental health professionals make clinical judgments, they gather a comprehensive psychosocial history about that person. Many of the traits that you have described could or could not be indicative of sociopathy or psychopathy, but a diagnostic determination requires extensive interviewing. Since I have so little information about you, it is difficult to answer your question.

If you want a deeper understanding of your personality or to know whether you have a psychological disorder, then consult a mental health professional who conducts personality testing. If the personality traits you have described are negatively impacting your life, consider counseling. Thanks for your question. Please take care.

Dr. Kristina Randle



from Ask the Therapist http://ift.tt/2cZcbIy
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

What Tig Notaro’s New Show Gets Right about Child Sexual Abuse

what Tig Notaro's new show gets right about child sexual abuseIn the new Amazon series One Mississippi, loosely based on the life of comedian Tig Notaro, she finds herself living back home in Mississippi following the sudden death of her mother. Staying in her childhood home with her stepfather, Bill, and her adult brother, Remy, Tig isn’t just facing the grief of losing her mother, she’s recovering from breast cancer, which resulted in a double mastectomy, and suffering from a C. diff infection. She’s also dealing with the ghosts of her past. Tig — as she’s also called on the show — was molested by her grandfather throughout her childhood.

Although it’s estimated that one in 10 children will be sexually abused before age 18, it’s rare to see a TV series deal with the reality of child sexual abuse. There’s so much about the issue that One Mississippi gets right.

People are a part of the trauma even if they don’t want to be.

Looking through a box of old photographs with her brother, Tig sees a picture of herself as a young girl sitting beside her grandfather. “Hey look, you’re being molested right now,” she says to the photo.

“Aw, come on, Tig!” her brother squirms.

“What? I was,” she tells him. “At least let me joke about it.”

“We should just throw that out,” he says grabbing the picture and leaving the room.

Hearing about child molestation can make people uncomfortable. It may be disturbing to imagine that your memories of a situation are tainted because in a back room or while your sister was away at camp she was being victimized. You don’t want to be a part of that reality — but neither does the victim.

Pretending that the past is over and that the pain doesn’t remain can’t fix anything. It’s alienating. It reinforces shame. It tells a victim, “This thing that happened to you is too grotesque for me to face and so I can’t be connected to you right now.”

Pretending it isn’t there, doesn’t make it go away.

Tig’s molestation keeps coming up even at the most seemingly unrelated moments because it is related. It’s related to everything. Trauma is woven into the fabric of life. She’s at home — not just in the town, but in the very house she lived in during the abuse. She’s surrounded by the same individuals who were a part of her life during the abuse, even if they had no idea what was happening to her.

Each times her family tries to keep abuse out of the conversation, resentment wells up. When her stepfather’s cat disappears, he accuses Tig of letting her out. She claims he might have mistakenly let her out himself. “You miss a lot,” she tells him.

After a pause, as if it’s the furthest thing from his mind, her stepfather Bill says, “Oh I can’t believe you’re bringing up that again.”

“That? The fact that I was molested by a creepy old man my entire childhood?” she asks.

“It’s been over 30 years. The man is dead,” he says. “ You know, when are you going to let go of that? It’s in the past.”

Moving on from abuse takes more than just “leaving it” in the past and learning to cope requires empathy.

“The dark does not destroy the light; it defines it. It’s our fear of the dark that casts our joy into the shadows.” – Brené Brown, The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You’re Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

You can’t accept good memories without accepting the bad as well.

That’s just how autobiographical memory works. Our experience — good and bad — informs everything we do every day.

“You say to move on,” she tells Bill. “Why not move on from the good, too? Like the day I learned to walk or birthday parties. Or when Remy pitched a perfect game? The good is in the past, too, Bill. You can’t pick and choose. Every chapter matters.”

“This is nonsense,” he says.

“You don’t seem to comprehend the impact all of this has had and continues to have on my life and Remy.”

It’s alienating when others won’t accept the bad. You lose closeness and trust in a way that can be difficult to repair.

“If you put shame into a petri dish and cover it with judgment, silence, and secrecy, it grows out of control until in consumers everything in sight — you have basically provided shame with the environment it needs to thrive. On the other hand, if you put shame in a petri dish and douse it with empathy, shame loses power and starts to fade. Empathy creates a hostile environment for shame — it can’t survive.”

– Brené Brown, I Thought It Was Just Me (But It Isn’t)

The truth wants to be told.

It takes an inordinate amount of courage for a person to talk about the sexual abuse they suffered. When you’re very young, it’s difficult to understand what’s happening to you. You doubt yourself because it’s easier to imagine you’re misinterpreting the abuse than it is to accept the fact that you’re in a very dangerous situation. In this case, it would also mean having to accept that family, someone who is supposed to love and care for you, is hurting you.

Shame is paralyzing and, despite not being responsible for what’s happening to them, victims often blame themselves. Personally, I felt defective and damaged by the abuse I suffered. I observed that what happened to me at home wasn’t happening in my friends’ homes. But rather than wanting to tell, I felt deeply ashamed. I thought that if other people knew what happened to me they would think I was disgusting, contaminated, perverse. I thought they wouldn’t want to know me anymore. Simultaneously, I didn’t want to keep my abuser’s secret. I didn’t want to protect him, but I felt powerless and afraid of his wrath.

“Owning our story can be hard but not nearly as difficult as spending our lives running from it.” — Brené Brown

One can only live in denial for so long. The truth will come out. It shows up in your thoughts and behavior — panic attacks, anxiety, depression, trouble with intimacy, difficulty in relationships, and many other symptoms of complex post-traumatic stress disorder.

In a flashback, we see Tig’s grades have plummeted and her mother asks her to take her education more seriously. Decline in schoolwork — a sign of the insidious secret abuse. The truth wants to be told.

I dealt with molestation through denial. In the show, Tig appears to deal with it through humor. I think a lot of trauma survivors can relate to “inappropriate humor.”

“A tough sense of humor or biting wit can get you through hard times. As long as you keep people laughing, you maintain a certain perspective distance. And as long as you keep laughing you don’t have to cry.”

The Courage to Heal: A Guide for Women Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse by Ellen Bass & Laura Davis

Empathy is the first step in ending the shame surrounding child sexual abuse and listening to the victim’s story is part of that. Validating their feelings, instead of turning away and giving into your own feelings of shame and guilt, is an important first step.

Maybe if more shows and movies confronted the reality of child sexual abuse, people wouldn’t feel so uncomfortable with the subject, they wouldn’t be caught so off-guard when it touches their lives, and they might learn to respond with empathy. Instead of running away from the truth, we can be inspired by the victim’s strength and remind them that they are worthy of respect and connection.

“Yes, I am imperfect and vulnerable and sometimes afraid, but that doesn’t change the truth that I am also brave and worthy of love and belonging.”
— Brené Brown, The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You’re Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You Are

mg7/Bigstock



from World of Psychology http://ift.tt/2dHCSpp
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

The Personality Trait Linked To A Longer Life

Survey of almost 30,000 people finds one personality trait consistently linked to longer life.

** Spark: 17 Steps That Will Boost Your Motivation For Anything (ebook) **



from PsyBlog http://ift.tt/2dHAAqj
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Book Review: Never Leave Your Dead

Book Review: Never Leave Your Dead

On March 7, 1953, Donald Watkins, a WWII veteran and China Marine, shot and killed his wife and mother-in-law. Judged criminally insane, Watkins served his sentence for this crime at Fairview State Hospital in Pennsylvania, one of the most abusive institutions for the mentally ill in American history. Eventually released thanks to the efforts of two young law students, Donald rejoined society—he even married again. It’s probably hard to imagine the woman who would marry a convicted murderer; it may be even more difficult to imagine your seventy-two-year-old mother doing so. And yet, that is exactly the story Diane Cameron tells in Never Leave Your Dead: A True Story of War Trauma, Murder, and Madness.

It is not a sensationalized book, but it is a patchwork book — part memoir, part biography, part history. And since Watkins has been deceased for twenty years, Cameron’s sources are secondhand. But Never Leave Your Dead traverses a number of topics, from the conditions at Fairview and St. Elizabeth’s to Cameron’s own experiences with Watkins to Thomas Szasz’s controversial theories. At times, it is intensely personal for Cameron, who writes fearlessly about herself and her family. At others, it is a tender and understanding examination of the psychological effects of war. For instance, Cameron uses simple narration to describe the day Watkins committed murder. She captures the haze of his disassociation, his pain, and his weariness. She writes not to erase his crime, but to better understand it. It is just one piece of the story she puts together, which is, as she notes, unavoidably out of order.

The chapters of Never Leave Your Dead are fairly short, lending themselves to the necessary switches in topic. In Chapter Four, “For God and Country,” Cameron introduces the China Marines, a group of men who served in Shanghai to protect the International Settlement there. This mission was an unsettling blend of licentiousness and horror. Shanghai was, as Cameron notes, “Paris on steroids, and the Marines were young and green.” With ready access to nightclubs, women, and shows, the China Marines were originally the envy of the military services. In the 1930s, however, with the Japanese invasion of China, the assignment became a horrific act of witness, as they observed the rape, torture, murder, and mutilation of thousands of Chinese citizens. Because of political conditions, the China Marines were unable to intervene or protect those outside the Settlement, producing intense feelings of survivor’s guilt and powerlessness.

While in the service and already showing signs of PTSD, Watkins attacked a friend and bunkmate, leading to his early discharge and commitment to St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, DC. Once committed, he was subjected to the mental illness treatments of his day, including electroconvulsive therapy. When he was released to rejoin society, he did not have any coping mechanisms to survive in post-WWII America. Meeting him many years later, Cameron describes a polite, quiet man with distinct tics and eccentricities, including the need to watch a particular television show at a particular time and a terror of driving on highways. These compulsions interfered with his personal life and his new family, and ultimately lead to tragic consequences.

These are just pieces of Cameron’s rich narrative, which intertwines her own struggles with those Watkins faced. Her research and pursuit of the truth about Watkins forms the skeleton of the text. As noted, she does not artificially assemble an orderly presentation of events. Instead, the reader experiences the organic unfolding of Watkins’ life as Cameron learns it. She details her experiences meeting the surviving China Marines, a colorful cast of characters if ever there was one. She introduces the two young law students, now middle-aged men, who arranged for Donald’s release from Fairview in the 1970s. And she engages the theories of Thomas Szasz, whom she meets on multiple occasions and whose theories of mental illness inform her own understanding of Watkins. But most importantly, she tells an untold story.

Full of the pain of war and horror of our history with mental illness, Never Leave Your Dead is by no means an easy read. And yet Cameron’s approach fully embraces the sentiment of the title, a central ethos of the Marine Corps. She could have easily left Watkins’ story untold, justified by the murder of two innocent women and her own complicated relationship to him. Instead, she asks us to consider Watkins’ life and the implications of his experiences in the military and afterward. She encourages us to meditate on the effects of war and how we care for — or more often don’t — those who come home after witnessing real horrors. And, using her own struggles, she draws meaningful connections between the pain of trauma and the pain of veterans’ trauma, not creating an unreachable other, but instead unifying them and us in our common humanity.

Never Leave Your Dead: A True Story of War Trauma, Murder, and Madness
Central Recovery Press, June 2016
Paperback, 176 pages
$15.95



from Psych Central http://ift.tt/2d8Z4qH
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Children could point the way to new HIV treatments

Children with HIV who can resist the disease progressing could point the way to new treatments for HIV infection that are more widely applicable to infected adults and children alike, an international team of researchers has found. The study looked at paediatric non-progressors (PNPs), the 5 – 10% of children infected with HIV in whom the disease […]

from Lunatic Laboratories http://ift.tt/2cEDyqo
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

Autism Is Revealed By These Common Signs

Those with autism often insist that their daily routines remain the same.

** Spark: 17 Steps That Will Boost Your Motivation For Anything (ebook) **



from PsyBlog http://ift.tt/2cOmEsH
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT

A Simple Idea to Save Your Marriage

a simple idea to save your marriageDo you feel like every argument you have with your partner sounds exactly like the last? Do you fight about the same things all the time and often feel like nothing ever gets resolved?

Many couples get caught up in what is known as “circular arguing.” Once it becomes a habit, it can be hard to know how to break it.

Sex, money, division of household chores and differing views on childrearing are the main topics about which couples fight. Every topic has its gray areas. When neither partner is willing to compromise or see the other’s point of view, the same arguments can drag on for years, eroding trust and whatever affection they once had for each other. The mere mention of a certain topic can lead to yet another full-scale argument. When the relationship has reached this point, there often is little chance of breaking the deadlock. However, there is another way. All it takes is a willingness to leave the script behind.

Therapist and author Harville Hendrix has over forty years’ experience helping couples to save their marriages. In his book Receiving the Love You Want, he offers this sage advice to couples whose marriages are in trouble: ‘It only takes one person to change the dynamic of the relationship.’

Think about that for a moment. Isn’t that an empowering thought? By adjusting your attitude and the way you engage with your partner, you have the power to steer the relationship back on course. So how can you turn a sinking ship back into the love boat? Here are some tips:

  • Change the script.

    When it comes to recurring arguments, couples tend to go on autopilot without realizing it. Each partner argues their side, often using the same words and phrases as the last time the topic came up. The result is the same. Both partners feel attacked, while at the same time refusing to listen to their partner’s point of view.

    When we focus solely on getting our own way, compromise becomes impossible. So the next time your partner raises the issue, surprise them. Instead of becoming defensive and launching into your spiel, stop and take a deep breath. Ask them why they feel the way they do. Ask them what they see as being the solution to the problem. Actively listen and refrain from interrupting. After they have finished explaining, repeat what they have told you, perhaps by saying: ‘So what you’re saying is….’

    This shows that you were listening. Asking for clarification eliminates any misunderstandings. After you have heard them out, thank them for sharing their thoughts with you and leave it at that. Resist the urge to state your own position for the time being. And give yourself a pat on the back. You have just taken the first step in breaking the cycle.

  • Building trust again.

    When you have been fighting like cats and dogs for longer than you can remember, it can really take a toll on the relationship. Show through your actions that you no longer want to argue with your partner about the same old things. Initially, they may not believe you as fighting has become such an ingrained part of your relationship, but by staying calm and looking at the situation objectively, you are showing them you are making a concerted effort to have more positive relations with them. However, don’t expect the dynamic between you to improve overnight. It may take months or even years for genuine trust to return.

  • Healthy couples compromise.

    As the Rolling Stones once put it so eloquently: ‘You can’t always get what you want.’ This is true of relationships as well as life. Sometimes the compromises we are forced to make may seem blatantly unfair. But if you and your partner cannot seem to agree on how a situation can be resolved, maybe it’s because for the time being, there is no satisfying solution.

    For example, many partners admit that in the early years when a couple is starting their family, the majority of the workload often unfairly falls on one person — usually the woman. However, this may balance out in later years when the children are older and she finds herself with more free time. In emotionally healthy and mature relationships, both partners take it in turns to put their partner’s needs first.

So what changes can you make in order to create a more loving relationship between you and your partner? Even if you think there is no way back, if you are willing to invest the time and effort, you will begin to see positive changes. It can be hard to break the “circular argument” cycle once this becomes the typical way of dealing with problems within the relationship. But neither partner is truly powerless to fix a relationship that seems irreparable. If one person begins to change his or her behavior and makes an effort to show their partner more kindness and compassion, it is almost guaranteed the other person will notice and begin to respond in kind.

fredgoldstein/Bigstock



from World of Psychology http://ift.tt/2d9TNCd
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT