Today marks the day of 12 years of blogging. Twelve years! During this time, I've managed to remain a mysterious pseudonym to almost everyone. Very few people know who I am.
But a lot has changed since then. The Open Science movement, the rise of multiple platforms for critique, the Replication Crisis in social psychology, the emergence of methodological terrorists, data police, and destructo-critics. Assertive psychologists and statisticians with large social media presences have openly criticized flawed studies using much harsher language than I do. Using their own names. It's hard to stay relevant...
Having a pseudonym now seems quaint.
The most famous neuro-pseudonym of all, Neuroskeptic, interviewed me 2 years ago in a post on Pseudonyms in Science. He asked:
What led you to choose to blog under a pseudonym?
My answer:
It was for exactly the same reason that reviewers of papers and grants are anonymous: it gives you the ability to provide an honest critique without fear of retaliation. If peer review ever becomes completely open and transparent, then I’d have no need for a pseudonym any more.
In an ideal world, reviewers should be identified and held accountable for what they write. Then shoddy reviews and nasty comments would (presumably) become less common. We’ve all seen anonymous reviews that are incredibly insulting, mean, and unprofessional. So it’s hypocritical to say that bloggers are cowardly for hiding under pseudonyms, while staunchly upholding the institution of anonymous peer review. ...
Neuroskeptic also interviewed Neurobonkers (who went public) and Dr. Primestein (who has not).
Have you ever been tempted to drop the pseudonym and use your real name? What do you think would happen (positive and negative if you did?)
My answer:
. . .
If I were to drop the pseudonym, it might be good (and bad) for my career as a neuroscientist. I could finally take credit for my writing, but then I’d have to take all the blame too! But overall, it’s likely that less would happen than I currently imagine.
{At this point, most people probably don't care who I am.}
So what has changed? Have I left the field? No. But some serious and tragic life events have rendered my anonymity irrelevant. I just don't care any more.
In September, my closest childhood friend died from cancer (see Survival and Grief).
I'm on the right.
Then a month later, my wife was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. My sadness and depression and anxiety over this is beyond words.
I don't want to go into any more detail right now, but I'd like to show you who we are. We met via our blogs in 2006.
Snowshoeing on Mt. Seymour, December 2016
I'm on the left.
So yeah, think of this as my “coming out”. Sorry if I've offended anyone with my ability to blend into male-dominated settings.
Thank you for reading, and for your continued support during this difficult time.
from The Neurocritic http://ift.tt/2DJ7IeK
via https://ifttt.com/ IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment